Analysis Demos
EquityAAPL
CryptoBTCUSD
ForexEURUSD
Tools
Dividends
Portfolio
About
Disclosure
Equity Analysis · AAPL
Apple Inc.

18 analytical methods fire simultaneously. Stochastic DCF with sector routing, 5,000-path Monte Carlo, 4-factor regression against FRED macro data, automated stress testing, risk scoring, and 17 interactive charts — from one engine run.

You can already look up a stock's P/E ratio anywhere. This runs 18 computational methods and tells you the probability your investment makes money, what it's worth under 3,000 different assumptions, and exactly how much you could lose.
+18.4%
Expected Return
$234
Fair Value
8.2
Risk Score /25
62%
Prob. Profit
-14.2%
VaR 95%
0.89
Sharpe
01 · Monte Carlo Simulation
5,000 paths · GBM
5,000 simulated futures. 62% end above today's price. Median outcome $234 over 12 months.
Median$234.20
P10 – P90$168 — $312
Prob. Profit62.4%
Expected+18.4%
02 · Volatility Cone
Historical percentiles
Current vol is in the 40th percentile — normal, not stretched. The cone shows where vol typically sits at each horizon.
03 · Value at Risk
Parametric + Historical
Worst expected loss at 95% confidence. Everything left of the red line is the tail — the 5% of scenarios where things go wrong.
Ann. Vol24.8%
Sharpe0.89
Sortino1.24
Max DD-18.3%
04 · Stochastic DCF — Fair Value
3,000 sims · Sector-routed
3,000 DCF simulations with randomised growth, margins, and discount rates. Median fair value $234 (green) vs market $198 (red). Sector routing picks the right model — corporate FCF for tech, DDM for banks, NAV for REITs.
Fair Value$234.20
P25 – P75$208 — $268
Upside+18.0%
05 · Sensitivity Analysis (Tornado)
Top 6 factors
Which inputs move the price most. Revenue growth matters most — a 1% change swings fair value by $12. Discount rate is second.
06 · Factor Regression Betas
4-factor OLS · FRED data
AAPL moves 1.18× with SPY but only 0.3× with rates. Four-factor OLS regression against FRED macro data. R² shows how much of the variance is explained.
SPY Beta1.18
Rate Beta0.30
0.74
Alpha+2.1%
07 · Stress Test Scenarios
6 sector-specific scenarios
In a 2008-style crash, the model shows a -34% drawdown. Rate hike scenario: -12%. Dovish pivot: +18%. Six sector-specific scenarios from the template.
08 · Horizon Dashboard
3M – 5Y comparison
Short-term momentum is positive. Long-term mean reversion is neutral. Method weights shift automatically — 3M emphasises momentum, 5Y emphasises fundamentals.
09 · Risk Metrics Overview
Sharpe 0.89, Sortino 1.24, Calmar 0.67. Getting paid for the risk — Sortino confirms downside risk is well-compensated.
Sharpe0.89
Sortino1.24
Calmar0.67
Ann. Vol24.8%
10 · Price Projection — Fan Chart
12-month forward
Time-series fan showing the path, not just the destination. P25–P75 band over 12 months: $208–$268. Narrower than the MC histogram because paths are correlated over time.
11 · Drawdown Timeline
4 years of history
Worst drawdown in 4 years: -18.3%. Recovery took 4 months. Every peak-to-trough decline mapped. Deeper and longer drawdowns signal higher risk.
Max Drawdown-18.3%
Avg Recovery47 days
Current DD-1.2%
12 · Mean Reversion — Z-Score
200-day baseline
Z-score +0.4σ — slightly above the 200-day average. Not overextended. Crosses ±2σ (red zones) signal extreme stretch with high mean-reversion probability.
13 · Seasonality — Monthly Returns
4-year averages
Q4 is historically strongest (Oct–Dec green). February and September tend weakest. Based on 4 years of monthly return averages.
14 · Factor Correlation Matrix
Heatmap
AAPL correlates 0.82 with QQQ (bright) but only 0.31 with gold (dim). Bright squares = high correlation. Helps identify what's actually driving the stock.
15 · Scenario Tree
Probability-weighted
Bull case (35% prob): $268. Base (45%): $234. Bear (20%): $178. Probability-weighted outcomes from the sector template's scenario events.
Bull (35%)$268
Base (45%)$234
Bear (20%)$178
16 · Dividend Profile
Dividend history with growth trajectory. Current yield, 5-year growth rate, consecutive streak, safety score (0–100), best month to buy. Badges: Dividend King (50+ yr), Aristocrat (25+), Achiever (10+).
Yield0.52%
Growth (5Y)+5.2%
Streak12yr
Safety78
17 · Interactive Chart Workspace
TradingView LC · 9 timeframes
Candlestick, line, area, or bar charts with volume overlay. RSI and Bollinger Band sub-panels. 9 timeframes from 1W to Max. Independent from the analysis horizon — browse the chart while the engine runs.
5×5 Risk Matrix
8.2 / 25
Market
12
Operational
6
Financial
4
Regulatory
9
Strategic
10

Overview Tab

Engine verdict with 6 key metrics. Cause-effect chain showing how sector dynamics flow through to the stock. Leading indicators to watch. Space for your own analyst notes — your research, organized alongside the engine output.

Risk Assessment Tab

Interactive 5×5 risk matrix. Likelihood × Impact scoring across 5 categories. The engine auto-scores from market data and financials — you can override any score. Composite risk number for cross-stock comparison.

Forecasts Tab

All 15 charts above. Each chart card is clickable — opens an insight overlay with "What This Tells You" (contextual analysis from THIS stock's data) and "How It Works" (methodology background).

Research Tab

Interactive chart workspace with candlestick, line, area, or bar charts. Volume, RSI, Bollinger Band overlays. 9 timeframes (1W to Max). Dividend profile with safety scoring. Independent from the analysis — browse while the engine runs.

Scenarios Tab

Stress scenarios from the sector template — rate hikes, recession, oil shock, specific sector risks. Each scenario shows factor shocks and expected portfolio impact. Scenario event trees with probability-weighted outcomes.

Factors Tab

The regression factors used for this sector — which FRED macro series drive the stock and how. DCF model structure showing revenue driver, cost driver, terminal approach, and key assumptions for this sector.

Market Data

4 years of daily price history. Current quote with price, volume, market cap. 52-week range. Sector classification (GICS). All from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP).

Fundamentals

5 years of annual + 8 quarters of financial statements: income statement, balance sheet, cash flow. Key metrics: PE, PS, PB, EV/EBITDA, dividend per share, payout ratio, book value.

Macro Factors

FRED economic data: Treasury yields (2Y, 10Y), yield curve spread, Fed Funds rate, VIX, crude oil, gold, USD index, CPI, consumer sentiment, housing starts, manufacturing employment.

Sector Intelligence

20 sector templates (11 GICS equity + 5 crypto + 2 forex + 2 base). Each template defines: regression factors, DCF model structure, stress scenarios, risk factor descriptions, leading indicators, cause-effect chains.

Crypto Analysis · BTCUSD
Bitcoin

Crypto-native analysis: Student-t fat-tailed Monte Carlo with regime switching, NVT proxy valuation, momentum regime detection. No DCF — crypto has no cash flows.

The same GBM model that works for Apple will give you garbage for Bitcoin. Crypto has fat tails and regime switches — quiet months interrupted by 40% moves. We model that.
How crypto analysis differs

Monte Carlo uses Student-t distributions (fat tails, df=4.5) with regime-switching volatility (quiet ×1, volatile ×2.5). No DCF — replaced by NVT proxy and momentum regime detection. Risk categories swap to: Volatility, Liquidity, Protocol, Regulatory, Concentration.

+42.1%
Expected Return
$2.1T
Market Cap
Bull
Regime
58%
Prob. Profit
24%
Prob. 2×
8%
Prob. ½
Monte Carlo — Student-t Fat Tails
5,000 paths · Regime switching
Wider fan than equity MC — fat tails capture extreme moves. 10th percentile drops to $58K, 90th reaches $248K. Regime switching models quiet vs volatile crypto periods.
What Stays · What Changes
Kept (14): MC Simulation, Volatility Cone, Value at Risk, Factor Regression (BTC/ETH/DXY factors), Stress Tests (crypto scenarios), Horizon Dashboard, Risk Metrics, Fan Chart, Drawdown, Mean Reversion, Seasonality, Correlation Matrix, Scenario Tree, Chart Workspace.

Removed (3): Stochastic DCF (no cash flows), Sensitivity Tornado (DCF-dependent), Dividend Profile (crypto doesn't pay dividends).

Added: NVT Proxy valuation, Momentum Regime detection (bull/bear/sideways), Volume Profile analysis. Verdict bar shows Market Cap, Regime, Prob. 2× and Prob. ½ instead of Fair Value and Risk Score.
Risk Matrix
14.6 / 25
Volatility
18
Liquidity
8
Protocol
5
Regulatory
15
Concentration
14

Price & Volume

4 years of daily OHLCV data. Volume profile for liquidity assessment. Market cap tracking.

Crypto Factors

Regression against BTC, ETH, SOL, DOGE, LINK, BNB. Plus DXY, VIX, Treasury yields from FRED. 5 crypto sector templates: L1, DeFi, Exchange, Infrastructure, Meme.

Forex Analysis · EURUSD
EUR/USD

Rate-driven analysis: interest rate differentials between ECB and Federal Reserve, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck mean-reverting Monte Carlo, PPP deviation, REER Z-score.

Currencies don't trend — they revert to equilibrium. The standard Monte Carlo assumes a random walk. We use Ornstein-Uhlenbeck because that's actually how forex behaves.
How forex analysis differs

Monte Carlo uses Ornstein-Uhlenbeck mean-reverting process — currencies snap back to equilibrium, they don't random walk like equities. Analysis centers on interest rate differentials from FRED (ECB vs Fed, BOE vs Fed, BOJ vs Fed). No DCF. Risk categories: FX Volatility, FX Liquidity, Macro Divergence, Central Bank, Geopolitical.

2.00%
ECB Rate
4.50%
Fed Rate
-2.50%
Differential
USD
Carry Favours
1.0920
Equilibrium
54%
Prob. Above
Monte Carlo — Mean Reverting (OU)
5,000 paths · θ=0.05
Fan pulls toward equilibrium at 1.0920. Narrower than equity MC — forex majors revert, they don't trend. The OU process models mean-reversion speed (θ=0.05 for majors).
What Stays · What Changes
Kept (14): MC Simulation (OU process), Volatility Cone, Value at Risk, Factor Regression (DXY/rates/VIX factors), Stress Tests (forex scenarios — Fed pivot, intervention, risk-off), Horizon Dashboard, Risk Metrics, Fan Chart, Drawdown, Mean Reversion, Seasonality, Correlation Matrix, Scenario Tree, Chart Workspace.

Removed (3): Stochastic DCF (currencies have no intrinsic value), Sensitivity Tornado (DCF-dependent), Dividend Profile (forex doesn't pay dividends).

Added: Interest rate differential display (ECB vs Fed, BOE vs Fed, BOJ vs Fed from FRED). PPP deviation and REER Z-score for long-term equilibrium. Carry direction indicator. Verdict bar shows country rates, differential, equilibrium, and carry direction.
Risk Matrix
7.4 / 25
FX Volatility
7
FX Liquidity
3
Macro Divergence
10
Central Bank
9
Geopolitical
8

Rate Data (FRED)

ECB Deposit Facility Rate, SONIA (Bank of England), Japan 3M Interbank, Fed Funds Rate, 2Y/10Y Treasury yields. Live from the Federal Reserve Economic Data API.

Forex Factors

Regression against USD Index (DXY), 2Y/10Y yields, yield curve spread, VIX, crude oil. 2 forex templates: Major pairs and Exotic pairs with tailored scenarios.

Dividend Tools
Dividend Hunter & Capture

Screen S&P 500 by yield, safety, growth, and payout. Identify capture opportunities with scored ex-date calendars. Track streaks, find aristocrats, project income.

Most dividend screeners show you yield and nothing else. We score safety — because a 6% yield that gets cut to 0% isn't a dividend, it's a trap. AT&T taught that lesson.

Dividend Hunter

Screen the S&P 500 by yield, safety score, streak, 5-year growth, and payout ratio. Sort by any column. Filter by sector, minimum yield, minimum streak. Every stock gets a composite safety score (0–100) based on payout ratio, free cash flow coverage, debt levels, earnings stability, and consecutive payment streak.

Capture Calendar

Monthly calendar showing every ex-dividend date in the S&P 500. Click a date to see which stocks go ex that day. Each opportunity scored by yield, volatility, and historical recovery pattern. Filter by universe: All S&P 500, Blue Chip (>$100B), High Yield (>3%), or by sector.

Safety Scoring

Composite 0–100 score. Factors: payout ratio (lower = safer), free cash flow coverage (can they afford the dividend?), debt/equity (are they borrowing to pay?), earnings stability (consistent or volatile?), streak length (how long have they paid?). Badges: King (50+ yr), Aristocrat (25+), Achiever (10+).

Capture Signals

For each stock near its ex-date: ex-date drop behaviour (does price drop the full dividend?), recovery speed (how fast does it bounce?), volatility context (is the stock calm or choppy?), yield vs risk tradeoff. Scored as good / neutral / caution.

82
Safety Score
3.3%
Yield
25yr
Streak
+7.2%
5Y Growth
Top Dividend Picks
Ticker
Name
Yield
Safety
Streak
Growth
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
3.3%
82
62yr
+5.8%
PG
Procter & Gamble
2.4%
88
68yr
+6.1%
KO
Coca-Cola
3.0%
85
62yr
+3.4%
ABBV
AbbVie
3.8%
71
52yr
+8.2%
T
AT&T
6.2%
38
0yr
-47%
Portfolio Analysis
Growth Portfolio

Correlated Monte Carlo with Cholesky decomposition, efficient frontier, correlation heatmap, aggregated stress tests, sector exposure, and per-holding P&L tracking.

Analysing stocks individually misses the point. Your AAPL and MSFT are 0.85 correlated — you don't have two positions, you have one big tech bet. Portfolio analysis shows you what you actually own.

Correlation Matrix

Heatmap showing how every holding moves relative to every other. High correlation (>0.7) means your diversification is weaker than you think. Helps identify redundant positions.

Efficient Frontier

500 random portfolio weights plotted on a risk-return chart. Your current allocation shown as a dot. If you're below the frontier, you can get more return for the same risk by rebalancing.

Correlated Monte Carlo

Cholesky decomposition preserves inter-stock correlations during simulation. The portfolio fan chart is more realistic than running MC on each stock independently and summing.

Aggregated Stress Tests

How the PORTFOLIO (not individual stocks) responds to scenarios like rate hikes, recession, oil shock. A portfolio of tech + energy may hedge a scenario that kills tech alone.

Sector Exposure

Pie chart showing concentration by GICS sector. If 60% of your portfolio is technology, you know your fate is tied to one sector.

Diversification Ratio

Weighted average of individual vols / portfolio vol. Above 1.2 = good diversification benefit. Below 1.05 = your holdings are so correlated you barely benefit from having multiple positions.

+14.2%
Expected Return
18.4%
Portfolio Vol
-12.1%
VaR 95%
0.77
Sharpe
1.34×
Diversification
59%
Prob. Profit
Holdings · $147,200
+$11,380 · +12.4%
Ticker
Name
Weight
Value
P&L
P&L %
AAPL
Apple
28.5%
$41,668
+$5,210
+14.3%
MSFT
Microsoft
24.2%
$35,581
+$3,840
+12.1%
JNJ
J&J
16.8%
$24,676
-$1,240
-4.8%
XOM
Exxon
14.1%
$20,772
+$2,160
+11.6%
Disclosure
What This Is. What It Isn't.

These are not legal boilerplate. They are statements about what the tool does and does not do. Full disclosure page →

×REF-01Not Financial Advice
Market Risk runs quantitative models on market data. It does not tell you what to buy, sell, or hold. Models are built on assumptions and historical data — both can be wrong. A Monte Carlo simulation showing 62% probability of profit means there is a 38% probability of loss.
×REF-02Not a Guarantee
Every number produced by this platform is an estimate derived from a model. Models simplify reality — that is their purpose and their limitation. Monte Carlo paths are probability distributions, not predictions.
×REF-03Analysis Can Be Wrong
All analysis can be wrong. Historical volatility may understate future volatility. Factor relationships may break down during crises. The engine does not claim to predict the future.
×REF-04Your Research, Your Risk
Every analysis you run is private. We don't share it, sell it, or trade on it. What you do with the analysis is entirely your responsibility.
×REF-05Data Sources & Limitations
Market data from FMP. Macro indicators from FRED. Data may be delayed, incomplete, or contain errors. Price history capped at ~4 years. Not real-time.